Adam Giambrone and John Sewel argue at the Architecture, Urban Design and Toronto talk.

When Did This Become a Debate?

Adam Giambrone and John Sewel argue at the Architecture, Urban Design and Toronto talk.

The Architecture, Urban Design and Toronto talk was quite good. Though it was not intended to be a political debate, it quicky devolved into one by the time the Q&A session began. Adam Giambrone was in the uncomfortable position of being the only currently sitting member of council taking part in the discussion. As such, he was constantly on the defensive from attacks from the other panalists, who felt city hall was doing a pretty craptastic job of running the city.

Comments (2)

prev      Ramanan Sivaranjan, Sunday October 22 2006      next

home|comments|about|contents

ramanan sivaranjan   mt 3.2   1and1.com   xhtml    css    photoblogs.org    photoblog profile