A painting of me

Adam Vaughan outlines the problems with the airport tunnel proposal. ⇒

   7 September 2009, late evening

"When $38m dollars is given over to one company with no public process and it is used to subsidize the movement of a small group of travellers, something is seriously wrong."

This is a post from my link log: If you click the title of this post you will be taken the web page I am discussing.

Perma-Link  

Comments

  1. I can agree that there should be more transparency as to why they need so much money for a tunnel and how it is going to be spent. $38 million for a pretty short tunnel is kind of excessive. You would think it would be cheaper than that.

    However, I don’t think having a tunnel is a bad thing. The ferry is kind of annoying since you have to account for that potential 15 minute delay if you miss one while rushing for your flight.

    by Iluvitar on September 7 2009, 11:26 pm   #

Don't be shy, you can comment too!

 
Some things to keep in mind: You can style comments using Textile. In particular, *text* will get turned into text and _text_ will get turned into text. You can post a link using the command "linktext":link, so something like "google":http://www.google.com will get turned in to google. I may erase off-topic comments, or edit poorly formatted comments; I do this very rarely.