A painting of me

US newspaper to charge website commenters. ⇒

   14 July 2010, late morning

The paper plans to charge a one-time 99 cents fee to post a comment. You pay via credit-card, and the name on the card is the name that will appear when you comment. I hope other papers follow this lead. I think it would get rid of the vast majority of stupidness that litters most newspaper comment sections. People probably won’t be so straight-up racist/homophobic/bigoted if their name sits right next to their screed.

This is a post from my link log: If you click the title of this post you will be taken the web page I am discussing.

Perma-Link  

Comments

  1. heh. And yet when Blizzard wanted to do the same with their messageboards (tie everything to real names), people flipped out.

  2. The best articulation of why that was a bad idea for Blizzard was a comment on MetaFilter. It’s not quite the same scenario as a news web site.

  3. Paki.

  4. God damn it, Rishi. This is why we can't have nice things.

  5. I see them both as trying to force people to behave in public by forcing them to be accountable (they’re named, forever) when posting. I don’t think the topic of discussion (whether news or a game) really makes a difference. And I think the arguments in that MetaFilter post apply equally to a newspaper’s website?

Don't be shy, you can comment too!

 
Some things to keep in mind: You can style comments using Textile. In particular, *text* will get turned into text and _text_ will get turned into text. You can post a link using the command "linktext":link, so something like "google":http://www.google.com will get turned in to google. I may erase off-topic comments, or edit poorly formatted comments; I do this very rarely.