A painting of me

Universal Binaries and Intel-Native Mac Applications. ⇒

   4 March 2006, late evening

I had forgotten Adobe has lightroom in development at the moment. I need to try it out.

This is a post from my link log: If you click the title of this post you will be taken the web page I am discussing.

Perma-Link  

Comments

  1. I am finding that I use Lightroom and Photoshop together. I have Lightroom open to compare similar shots and choose the best ones quickly, then I open them in PS for editing. I haven’t messed with the Lightroom editing enough to figure out if I could do the whole process there. My editing needs are fairly minimal. But it’s a pretty nice app, altogether.

  2. I used Lightroom when the initial beta came out. Very promising but not for me. While Aperture is definitely targetted towards high-end pros, Lightroom is geared towards folks with the new prosumer DSLRs. Which one is a bigger demographic? Apple might have priced itself out.

    Personally I stick to Bridge. Its not a database but rather a browser. Its quick and works well with Photoshop. Sure the management aspects of transferring photos is not automatic (like iPhoto etc) but I am starting to like Image Capture.

    In other words, choices are good. This space will only become more interesting as so many people are into digital photography now.

Don't be shy, you can comment too!

 
Some things to keep in mind: You can style comments using Textile. In particular, *text* will get turned into text and _text_ will get turned into text. You can post a link using the command "linktext":link, so something like "google":http://www.google.com will get turned in to google. I may erase off-topic comments, or edit poorly formatted comments; I do this very rarely.