An Irvine cop ejaculates on a motorist but escapes criminal liability. ⇒
11 February 2007, lunch time
What do you say to a headline like that? This link was found via MetaFilter.
This is a post from my link log: If you click the title of this post you will be taken the web page I am discussing.
Once again, I marvel at someone who is willing to throw their entire career out the window.
How many more women has he done this kind of thing to?
One can only wonder.
by radmila on February 11 2007, 2:35 pm #
How do you not get charged for something when you cum on a woman in public. Seriously?
by ramanan on February 12 2007, 7:48 am #
I think this is a good example of authority taking liberties with the underclass.
The old: who’s going to believe a stripper over a cop?
It would have worked too if he didn’t leave his DNA all over her.
The fact that he got off just shows that the public (at least the public in Irvine) still doesn’t value all people. Only ones that live up to a certain social standard.
by Radmila on February 12 2007, 12:33 pm #
Radmila, I think the phrase “The fact that he got off” might um, be misinterpreted in this case.
I just don’t understand how this case could have gone this way. That’s just such a blatant abuse of power. If the woman had ASKED him to ejaculate on her he should still be convicted.
by Ben on February 12 2007, 2:54 pm #
LOL...I didn’t mean the pun, but it fits…
by Radmila on February 12 2007, 4:45 pm #