Steve Sailer is my favourite junk-scientist
27 November 2006, late morning
The racial gap in average IQ is one of the most important factors in modern American life. (via The Hog Town Front)
I’m pretty sure it’s not — I’m not an American though. It is quite possible that American’s think paying credence to dubious test scores is an important part of living in America, I just don’t think it’s that likely. I think American’s have more important things to worry about. Steven Sailer is my favourite junk-scientist. He likes to write about Black people and White people. If you read enough of his articles you’ll quickly learn White people are the best people ever: better, stronger, faster. Yeah…
Occam’s Razor would suggest that the simplest and thus most likely explanation for the persistent gap in achievement is the equally persistent gap in aptitude.
Occam’s Razor would suggest that if you spend all your time trying to figure out how White people are the best peoples EVAH you probably have some issues you need to deal with.
Jonothan Kozol’s Still Separate, Still Unequal is a more interesting and well reasoned take on this subject. I would agree with Kozol: putting Black children in crap schools, and White kids in nice schools is a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy. (Sort of like the Gifted Program here in Toronto.)
I wouldn’t be surprised if ridding the SAT of analogies backfires and lowers the average black score because African-American humor is quite oriented toward analogy, simile, and metaphor: “Yo mama is so fat, she’s …”
Clearly Sailer has a deep understanding of the Black-psyche.
More discussion at The Hogtown Front.
by ramanan on November 27 2006, 11:56 am #
I think that Desmond Jones guy called you a ‘self loathing white man’ or something last time you linked to that site.
by mk on November 27 2006, 9:14 pm #
And I quote: Vismins won’t support you and neither will brain-dead self-loathing whites like joe blarnystone. That guy is awesome; though in his defense, there was a brief period of time my Joe Blarnystone profile didn’t point back to this blog. (When I moved over to Dreamhost, I killed my Blogger blog.)
by ramanan on November 27 2006, 10:13 pm #
Yes, IQ tests are total crap for lots of reasons…
I would agree with Kozol: putting Black children in crap schools, and White kids in nice schools is a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy.
There’s lots of empirical evidence to back up this hypothesis. i.e. After segregation ended and they started sending Black kids to schools in White neighbourhoods, etc. the gap in SAT score between Black and White kids narrowed significantly.
by Ryan on November 27 2006, 11:15 pm #
a study that points in the other direction
http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-298.html
For decades critics of the public schools have been saying, “You can’t solve educational problems by throwing money at them.” The education establishment and its supporters have replied, “No one’s ever tried.” In Kansas City they did try. To improve the education of black students and encourage desegregation, a federal judge invited the Kansas City, Missouri, School District to come up with a cost-is-no-object educational plan and ordered local and state taxpayers to find the money to pay for it.
Kansas City spent as much as $11,700 per pupil—more money per pupil, on a cost of living adjusted basis, than any other of the 280 largest districts in the country. The money bought higher teachers’ salaries, 15 new schools, and such amenities as an Olympic-sized swimming pool with an underwater viewing room, television and animation studios, a robotics lab, a 25-acre wildlife sanctuary, a zoo, a model United Nations with simultaneous translation capability, and field trips to Mexico and Senegal. The student-teacher ratio was 12 or 13 to 1, the lowest of any major school district in the country.
The results were dismal. Test scores did not rise; the black-white gap did not diminish; and there was less, not greater, integration.
The Kansas City experiment suggests that, indeed, educational problems can’t be solved by throwing money at them, that the structural problems of our current educational system are far more important than a lack of material resources, and that the focus on desegregation diverted attention from the real problem, low achievement.
by blah on December 11 2006, 10:14 am #
dubious test scores
Well, IQ results are predicted by physiological metrics like MRIs. For example [sorry if the carriage returns below don.t go through]:
http://www.loni.ucla.edu/~thompson/IQ/NRN2004_IQ.html
Neurobiological determinants of intelligence as measured by IQ:
Behavioral Genetics of IQ
Molecular Genetics of IQ
by blah on December 11 2006, 10:20 am #
I fail to see how links between physiology and IQ make IQ scores any less dubious? Did I miss something?
by ramanan on December 11 2006, 11:44 am #
You probably did. And it’s probably fully explained by your low IQ. Hey, how’s that for the causal link you searched for?
by saddamov on December 12 2006, 9:33 am #
No, I have a freakishly high IQ, so it’s not that. You know what, I’m a skinny guy, so my brain probably doesn’t weigh much. That’s probably what my problem is.
by ramanan on December 12 2006, 10:57 am #
But wait? Did you take a stab at the gifted schools in Scarborough? You know it was jam-packed with IQ goodness (that did connect to very smart people, less a few strange cases), just that there was quite a bit of social retardation…
by Victor on December 12 2006, 7:51 pm #